Nicolae Zeriu
De la cei mai de jos functionari ai statului, pana la mass-media care ne-arata zilnic ce ponoase trag cei care nu-i dau ascultatre, suntem indemnati sa ne supunem si sa fim cuminti, daca nu vrem sa ne atragem un control, o amenda, o ancheta penala, sau chiar ani grei, in puscarie.
Fireste, toate aceste amenintari sunt indreptate impotriva noastra, a oamenilor obisnuiti, care nu avem averi de milioane de euro, apartenenta la vre-o loja oculta satanica sau la serviciile secrete si influenta politica pe care acestea le confera, intr-un sistem nereprezentativ si corupt.
Suntem fortati sa jucam un joc ale carui reguli strambe sunt indreptate impotriva noastra, “facand frumos” unor mici si mai mari ticalosi, de dragul de-a ne intoarce acasa in sanul familei, pentru a-i injura la un pahar, pe cei care ne fac viata amara.
Suntem dispusi sa toleram incalcari si abuzuri intolerabile, pentru a ne conforma idioatei si ticaloasei expresii: “capul plecat, sabia nu-l taie”.
Astfel, rabdam cozi pentru a plati taxe oneroase, ghisee la care ne inclinam din mijloc, oameni ai legii a caror singura lege este faradelegea, aratand respect cel putin pe fata unor lichele securiste si progeniturilor lor, indivizi a caror unica pretentie la respectabilitate o constituie largimea pungii, inaltimea vilei si latimea limuzinelor din goana carora ne stropesc, sau calca.
Acestia sunt cei care, in loc de a tremura de frica noastra, asa cum au facut-o in ‘89-’90, uitand de-atunci de ea, au acumulat prin manipulare, jaf si vanzarea averii nationale, adevarate comori. Prin controlul pozitiilor cheie, ei se asigura ca tot ce misca-n tara asta, se face daca nu in folosul lor vadit, cel putin astfel incat sa nu ii deranjeze. A venit vremea sa le fie iarasi frica.
In fond, nu noi le datoram ascultare celor ale caror salarii le platim, ci invers.
Intr-un interval de timp neasteptat de scurt, servitorul public face iarasi pe seful cu stapanii sai, mai arogant si dispretuitor decat ii sade bine chiar si unui stapan adevarat.
La nivelul de sus, ne tradeaza unui imperiu strain si ostil, la cel mijlociu, fac temenele celor mai mari, pe cand celor de jos, nu le ramane decat sa le slujeasca, asuprindu-ne pe noi.
In fond, ce poate fi mai important, decat pastrarea serviciului, chiar si asa ingrat cum este?
In tot acest timp, suntem bombardati intr-o adevarata campanie de denigrare a tot ceea ce ne face pe noi Romani, cu initiative si diatribe virulente lansate impotriva Celui Caruia Ii datoram intreaga noastra ascultare si a slujitorilor Lui.
De la campania impotriva icoanelor in scoli, la neincetatele atacuri ale unui CNSAS devenit politie politica, la veritabilele linsaje mediatice pe care niste proteveuri si antene impanzite cu alogeni le-au lansat impotriva Bisericii noastre strabune, cu toate traditiile ei minunate.
Cand ati urmarit ultima oara o “stire”, in care un mare hram sa nu fi fost raportat ca o “imbulzeala” a unor superstitiosi ridicoli? Cand ati vazut un credincios cult, inteligent si bine imbracat, intervievat la fata locului? Nu-i vaneaza cumva reporterii pe cei care avand credinta curata, nu o pot exprima in chip coerent?
De ce se infig camerele de luat vederi si frumuselele, dar nestiutoarele reporterite, numai ca sa prezinte multimile binecredinciosilor ca gloate necivilizate, cuviosenia fata de sfinti si moastele lor, ca obscurantism si asteptarile la aghiazma mare si agapa frateasca de la sfarsit, ca o adunatura care da din coate ca sa ajunga ?
I-ar duce capul pe unii botezati in credinta sa faca asta, daca nu li s-ar impune de undeva, de sus?
Printr-un conglomerat de televiziuni, ziare si posturi radio, a caror adevarati stapani se afla inafara, liantul natiunii noastre este diluat, esenta noastra otravita, iar fiinta Romanului indepartata de adevarul care l-a creat.
Cum se compara “Eu sunt calea, adevarul si viata” cu “valorile UE, alianta NATO, si spatiul Schengen”?
Cum se face ca pentru a le dobandi pe astea din urma, suntem fortati sa renuntam la Cel dintai?
De cand au devenit guvernantii nostri, niste lachei ai unora care ne vrajmasesc de moarte, in loc de a ne reprezenta pe noi - De ce ii toleram?
Cand cei care pretind ca ne reprezinta, s-au dus cu arme si bagaje, la dusmanii nostri, cui se cuvine sa dam ascultare? Cand legile pamantesti sunt date de un parlament pus pe capatuiala, semnate de un presedinte tradator si aplicate de niste functionari corupti, se cade oare sa ne conformam, sau firesc ar fi sa le comparam legilor ceresti, respingandu-le pe cele care nu sunt modelate dupa ele?
Datoram noi supunere unor nemernici care ne tradeaza, sfideaza si batjocoresc, sau Celui care ne-a facut, ne iubeste si ne doreste intru imparatia Lui?
Normal ar fi ca cei pe care ii alegem, sa oglindeasca poporul care i-a ales, dar anormalul a devenit noua stare de lucruri, pe care noi o acceptam, din inertie si indiferenta.
Daca nu vrem sa devenim un biet ingredient in supa scarboasa a globalizarii masonice, este imperativ sa ne regasim carma si impreuna cu ea, carmaciul.
Mesajul este scris in inimile fiecaruia dintre noi, cei ce-am fost botezati in numele Lui.
De ce-am permite ca el sa fie sters, de niste lozinci ordinare, scornite de unii care urandu-L pe El, ne urasc si pe noi, fiii Lui?
Nu avem noi mai multa minte de-atat? S-au ispravit barbatii care sa-si apere neamul cu sabia si s-au istovit femeile lor intr-atat, de nu mai pot da nastere pruncilor, pe care sa-si bazeze neamul si familia, viitorul?
Au devenit puii de vulturi niste ciori nenorocite, numai prin repetitia unor mesaje otravite, scrise-n limba noastra?
“Acum ori niciodata, croieste-ti alta soarta, la care sa se-nchine, barbarii tai dusmani”.
(preluat de pe altermedia)
Friday, March 13, 2009
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Coca-Cola si alte produse ale industriei ... alimentare.
n-am auzit inca sa fie cineva obligat sa consume produsele toxice ale corporatiilor americane. Daca nu vedeti reteaua, vedeti doar cazuri izolate nu veti putea face nimic.
Voi aveti puterea dar nu stiti sa o apelati !!!
Loviti unde ii doare cel mai tare: $$$$$$$
si vor pleca!
inainte de pustii totul.
Voi aveti puterea dar nu stiti sa o apelati !!!
Loviti unde ii doare cel mai tare: $$$$$$$
si vor pleca!
inainte de pustii totul.
Monday, March 09, 2009
Irigatii cu materii cenusie
adevarat d-le Rapcea, in occident se stie de zeci de ani de zile dar nu se poate schimba raportul de forte. De ce nu s-au mobilizat mai mult de 1000 de oameni? Pentru ca nu cred. Pentru ca in fiecare zi sint demonstratii de protest iar omul de rind s-a obisnuit (asa e in democratie) cu protestele. Protestul s-a bagatelizat iar atitudinea civica este compromisa si bascalita de massmedia. Dar cind vor incepe sa creada va fi prea tirziu. Nu stiu daca va fi august 2009 nimeni nu poate sa stie exact cind vorbim la scara mondiala sint mii de factori asa ca sa nu ne hazardam. Dar cert este ceea ce fiecare poate sa vada si sa intuiasca ceea ce se pregateste, nu numai pentru romani ci intrega umanitate. Umanitatea nu este pregatita pentru ce va urma iar iesitul in strada nu va face decit sa arunce blamul asupra unor bieti oameni care au fost inaintea timpurilor. Credeti ca se vor apuca de munca in aceste 4 luni daca n-au facut-o de 30 de ani decind au inceput sa se scrie mii de carti care au avertizat ca nu sintem pregatiti sa ne sustinem, ma refer la 6 bil. de suflete? Am aratat noi romanii acum in ultimul ceas ca putem sa facem diferenta fata de occident si sa nu mai repetam greselile lor? Nici vorba. Inca se vorbeste de irigatii in Romania si de agricultura macro !!!
Sunday, March 08, 2009
RFID on SALE in Romania
este adevarat ca in "occident" sint oponenti, ca tehnologia RFID si alte mijloace de supraveghere si control nu sint "bine vazute". Asta ca sa dea impresia celor ce nu sint in occident ca occidentul ar fi foarte sensibil la "libertatile" lui fundamentale. Propaganda ieftina americana! Cei care sint sensibili si se opun sint o mina de oamenii care isi cistiga piinea din aceasta opozitie. Ceilalti habar nu au si nici nu le pasa de nimic pentru ca nu au cum sa se impotriveasca. Asa ca s-au obisnuit sa accepte totul fara nici o opozitie nici macar in cercuri restrinse unde este plind de informatori. Nu politici, ci economici. Eu am vazut implementate coduri pe uniforme, sisteme de supraveghere pe masini, sisteme de supraveghere (video surveilance) si altele si atita timp cit esti angajat si pe teritoriul exploatatorului trebuie sa accepti sau esti L-i-b-e-r ! Nu vei gasi un avocat care sa lupte cu o armata de avocati si un sistem sponzorizat de corporatie. Nu de sperieturi avem nevoie ci de solutii. Orasele "viitorului" erau prezente in operele soimilor patriei. Hai sa fim seriosi...
Earthquake - Hawaian solution
Cutemurul. Ultima soluţie. Şi Bucureştiul rămâne curat. Nu mai trebuie planuri, bugete.Pensiile vor scădea. Salariile de asemenea. Adevărată afacere pentru neocapitaliştii români- aceasta este una din speranţele lor.
Săracii creştini... capitalişti. Iehova le va ajuta să aibe succesuri şi vor face progresuri. Tata succesurilor şi progresurilor nu păţeşte nimic şi nici domnii lui tovarăşi pentru că şi-au făcut case separate. Poporul va fugi din capitală lăsându-le terenurile pentru dughene, bănci, şi bordele mascate.
nota 10!
nu e nimic nou. Ei cistiga asa cum am mai spus la doua miini. Ceea ce spui tu este cunoscut aici demult sub numele de shock doctrine. Poate ma repet am mai spus pe undeva recomand spre consultare Naomi Klein: Shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Au inceput in Asia cu Tsunami din 2005, in Iraq 2003, in New Orleans cu Katrina. Sa nu mai vorbesc de privatizarea health care, education, water, energia si transporturi. Care numai dupa citiva ani de management privat sint aduse in pragul falimentului. Oservati ce se intimpla azi in lumea capitalista! Teoria este pusa in aplicare dar nu inseamna ca si reuseste. Unde nu au reusit datorita opozitiei publice, au lasat natura si haosul sa intervina. Asa vreti sa ajungeti?
Săracii creştini... capitalişti. Iehova le va ajuta să aibe succesuri şi vor face progresuri. Tata succesurilor şi progresurilor nu păţeşte nimic şi nici domnii lui tovarăşi pentru că şi-au făcut case separate. Poporul va fugi din capitală lăsându-le terenurile pentru dughene, bănci, şi bordele mascate.
nota 10!
nu e nimic nou. Ei cistiga asa cum am mai spus la doua miini. Ceea ce spui tu este cunoscut aici demult sub numele de shock doctrine. Poate ma repet am mai spus pe undeva recomand spre consultare Naomi Klein: Shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Au inceput in Asia cu Tsunami din 2005, in Iraq 2003, in New Orleans cu Katrina. Sa nu mai vorbesc de privatizarea health care, education, water, energia si transporturi. Care numai dupa citiva ani de management privat sint aduse in pragul falimentului. Oservati ce se intimpla azi in lumea capitalista! Teoria este pusa in aplicare dar nu inseamna ca si reuseste. Unde nu au reusit datorita opozitiei publice, au lasat natura si haosul sa intervina. Asa vreti sa ajungeti?
Civil disobedience
nota 10! nu spune inca ca nu au reusit sa distruga prin razboi civil. Abia au inceput! Marea parte a poporului roman este de partea imperialismului american. Ei sint corupti de straini si-au vandut terenurile, pun la dispozitia strainului pamintul stramosesc, rudele mele, neamurile mele din Romania. Ei se vand firmelor straine. Daca statul nu poate concesina domeniul public atunci proprietarul roman permite americanului sa-si dezvolte afacerea pe bucata lui de pamint. De ce fac asta? Pentru ca noi nu le-am oferit alta solutie. Pentru ca solutia noastra este munca cinstita si nu comertul jidanesc! Pentru ca ei au vazut ca se poate fura si mintii sub acoperirea autoritatilor corupte si vandute imperialistilor. Au vazut pe alti cum s-au capatuit si acum vor si ei la fel. Si se POATE! Pentru ca americanul ca sa conduca trebuie sa corupa, sa distruga ordinea pentru ca apoi sa poata sa instaureze el controlul si "democratia". Daca poporul roman ar fi fost curat nu putea sa il domine si sa-l cumpere. Dar sint multe cozi de topor. Asa au facut de 200 de ani de la natiunile de indieni pe care iau corupt cu alcool, zaharelu, blonde atunci cind nu au mai reusit cu arme si patogeni (see steel and germs) pina la america centrala si south america, asia si mai nou europa de este. Au reusit printr-o multitidine de metode, putini au fost care si-au recistigat independenta de sub licheaua americana occidentala.
Saturday, March 07, 2009
BOR
de ce asteptati de la BOR sa faca ce voi stiti ca nu vor face? Veti fi satisfacuti cind peste 2 ani totalitarismul va fi instaurat complet? Nu ei vor suferii cel mai mult ci tot voi. Ei au scuza intodeuna ca daca ar fi mai transanti ar atrage institutia spre distrugere si undeva poate au dreptate. Fiti voi flacara iar ei (BOR) vor fi lumina care va va calauzi. Altfel facem servicul strainilor si ne distrugem singuri ceea ce avem mai sfint.
Friday, March 06, 2009
Oamenii care tund iarba
se vede ca evanghelismul sectant occidental patrunde cu viclenie pe acest portal. Bucurati-va fratii ortodocsi romani, occidentul depravat si corupt este in agonie. Falsa lor credinta in Hristos este credinta in $$$. Asta este religia lor adevarata iar acum institutiile lor se clatina. Ei fug acum si cauta adapost si la romani.
Noi stim cine sint ei chiar daca vin in blana de oaie.
Ei sint criminalii umanitatii ei au secatuit si otravit pamintul, aerul si apele.
Ei sint oamenii care tund iarba.
Ei sint cei care va vor binele atunci cind nu aveti nevoie decit de binecuvintarea Domnului.
Noi stim cine sint ei chiar daca vin in blana de oaie.
Ei sint criminalii umanitatii ei au secatuit si otravit pamintul, aerul si apele.
Ei sint oamenii care tund iarba.
Ei sint cei care va vor binele atunci cind nu aveti nevoie decit de binecuvintarea Domnului.
Smoke and mirrors
cum sa se pregateasca? Sa ridice premiile decernate de jidanime. Sint primii la toate relele (sa ma scuze Gilda ca nu dau definitia) sint progresisti si modernisti ca sa arate ca ei nu sint chiar asa de innapoiati. Tema fiindu-le ca vor pierde investitorii si oportunitatile de imbogatire peste noapte scursurile tarii accepta orice. Isi bat joc de ce avem mai sfint pentru ca stiu ca sintem crestini si vom intoarce obrazul celalalt si ne vom ruga pentru ei asa cum unii pe aici dau solutia magica. Gilda ti-as arata eu ce insemna limbaj pervers dar trebuie sa respect regulile AM.Zob, nu generaliza, nu toti crestinii romanii servesc Israelul la fel cum nu toti evreii sint jidani. Ai dreptate insa trebuie separate apele.
American Raj
puteti sa adaugati la bibliografie si American Raj a lui Eric S. Margolis. Sint putine natiuni care au rezistat ciumei jidanesti si masinii de razboi americane, fie ca e vorba de masina propagandistica holiudiana cu batjocura lor diver-sionista, fie ca e vorba de sacalii economici, fie ca e vorba de sectanii care cu viclenie intra in sufletul poporului confuzat si haituit. Romania a fost printre ele dar a ales intr-un moment intunecat, de ratacire mina stinga a diavolului atunci cind de fapt diavolul ne tinea in brate. Ne-am intors 100 de ani inapoi !!! Sintem in vremea Junglei lui Upton Sinclair. Cine nu traieste in occident nu intelege nimic din ce este America. Asa este d-le Spinu, nu vedem dezastrul in care se afla tara pentru ca romanul se uita la TV si nu-i pasa. Iar cind ii vine si lui rindul e prea tirziu. Mult prea tirziu !!!
Wednesday, March 04, 2009
Parzitii
nu toti cetatenii trebuie sa se astepte la ostilitati. Aparatul represiv si pupuncuristii sint si ei tot cetatenii Romaniei ei sint cei care pastreaza ordinea si linistea cetateanului (a lor insisi). Atita timp cit numarul acestora este mai mare atunci balanta se va inclina spre ei. Ei vor apara valorile democratiei si linsistea cetatenilor fideli (epurare etnica) in timp ce pentru ceilalti se vor chema ostiliati. Cu cit numarul si vocea celor nemultumiti vor creste cu atit represiunile vor fi mai justificabile. Cu atit mai mult ei vor creea pozitii noi in aparatul de represiune si cistiga putere pentru ca ei sint “suportati” financiar de … chiar victimele lor. Ei pot sa faca anumite lucruri sub acoperirea legii pe care voi nu puteti. Dar puteti sa vorbiti liber despre inmultirea magnoliilor, imblinzirea puilor de cirtita, puteti, sa-l injurati pe presedinte si alesii vostrii ca sa se vada (chiar si la TV) cit de permisiv este regimul (democratic binenteles) cu cei care nu impartasesc aceleasi idei cu ei.Da, Judex, tara tot asa va ramane daca voi vreti sa ramina asa. Iar ca unii vor se inteleaga ca numai in Romania este asa de rau, nu este decit infatuarea imbecila a celui ce nu a depasit granitele mentale ale cartierului. Daca tu imi dai exemplu o tara unde fortele politienesti sint in descrestere si apara oamenii de rind, cei lipsiti de resurse si nu linistea si bogatia conducatorilor si acolitilor lor atunci mai vorbim. Sistemul actual (actual nu insemna neaparat nou, a mai fost, actorii/spectatorii sint noi) a fost creeat ca sa produca discrepante, concurenta, dezordine organizata pina la iminentul haos chiar mult temutul anarhism (apogeul raului nu???) pentru a tine in viata parazitii.
Din ciclul amintit
nu repetati decit anii 60, 70 din occident. Unde a ajuns occidentul acum? Ei se bucura ca voi se protestati, sa iesiti in strada sa fie chiar si tulburari (ei sint protejati) vor avea de lucru. Iar ceea ce vor sa faca vor face acum sau mai tirziu. Parazitii societatii cistiga de pe urma voastra in acest sistem. Nu faceti decit sa fiti analizati in sedinte si data viitoare vor veni mai puternici in timp ce voi veti fi tot mai putini si demoralizati. Solutia este alta! Gasiti-o daca vreti sa scrieti istoria daca nu veti fi istorie pentru altii.
Sunday, March 01, 2009
Energia maro
masina aia de manipulare nu e sustinuta de forte oculte ci de voi. Ca vreti voi sa fie mai misterios ca sa va ascundeti in fata neputintei asta e altceva. Ca sa aveti independeta politica trebuie sa aveti independenta economica financiara, trebuie sa aveti independenta energetica. Iar romanul sub asaltul mediatic s-a trezit consumator peste noapte, s-a occidentalizat, crede ca bunastarea lui materiala va fi nefinita. Ori asa ceva nu se va intimpla. Lasati politica in mina parazitilor si incepeti sa fiti independeti energetic lasati-i pe ei sa dea cite legi vor pentru "binele" nostru.
Saturday, February 28, 2009
Un roman treaz
Sa fie clar ca politicienii nostrii precum si reprezentantii nostrii in organisme internationale nu sunt alceva decat niste ticalosi ordinari, unelte in mana ocultei internationale, care nu ne reprezinta pe noi ci pe stapanii lor de la tel aviv si uasinton. noii stapani ai lumii finanteaza si promoveaza hotia, depravarea, decaderea morala a cetatenilor planetei si mai ales a crestinilor. Reprezentantii nostrii la onu era normal sa voteze pt. depravare alaturi de israel si statele unite. Ca doar ei sunt niste slugi de cea mai joasa speta si asta stiu sa faca, sa joace dupa cum le canta stapanii. Scopul acestor stapani ai lumii este acela de a demonstra ca cetatenii planetei si mai ales crestinii nu sunt altceva decat o masa de decazuti si depravati ce in final vor fi tratati ca atare, prin forta si teroare ca pe animale. Acolo vor sa ne aduca. Toate astea completatea cu problema falsa, indusa de ei a terorimului international. Si cand vor crea aceste conditii, vor instaura un regim dictatorial spunandu-ne ca este ultima solutie de salvare a planetei. De fapt scopul lor final este acela de a acapara puterea politica, economica, militara, finantele, resursele minerale, etc. la nivel global.
in sfirsit avem un roman care s-a desteptat . Cit va mai trebui pina sa si actionezi?
da-mi voie gruia numai o rectificare:
cetatenii planetei, dar nu in totalitate, pentru ca foarte multi au iesit din sistem dar binenteles ca sub controlul “democratiei” nu se va stii curind de ei pentru ca nu au “mijloace” democratice prin care sa se faca auziti.
iar crestinii pe linga ce spui tu eu as adauga in plus o masa usor manipulabila, infirorator de dezinformata, lipsita de resurse, planificat dezorientata (cum frumos spun ei creative destruction) pe care papusarii nu pot sa se abtina sa nu o utilizeze.
In rest ce sa mai spun ref la articol ca urmeaza o lege (poate este deja dar inca nu a inceput persecutia) prin care sa se interzica ca si aici in “democratie” orice comentariu la adresa stim noi caror “favorizati” de natura sau D-zeul lor personal. Si cu asta basta. Nici usturoi n-ai mincat nici gura nuti pute. Ce daca democratia “prost inteleasa” am extrapola-o putin si am mai ingradi putin din liberatile astea democratice. Ca sa aparam “valorile” democratiei, binenteles!
in sfirsit avem un roman care s-a desteptat . Cit va mai trebui pina sa si actionezi?
da-mi voie gruia numai o rectificare:
cetatenii planetei, dar nu in totalitate, pentru ca foarte multi au iesit din sistem dar binenteles ca sub controlul “democratiei” nu se va stii curind de ei pentru ca nu au “mijloace” democratice prin care sa se faca auziti.
iar crestinii pe linga ce spui tu eu as adauga in plus o masa usor manipulabila, infirorator de dezinformata, lipsita de resurse, planificat dezorientata (cum frumos spun ei creative destruction) pe care papusarii nu pot sa se abtina sa nu o utilizeze.
In rest ce sa mai spun ref la articol ca urmeaza o lege (poate este deja dar inca nu a inceput persecutia) prin care sa se interzica ca si aici in “democratie” orice comentariu la adresa stim noi caror “favorizati” de natura sau D-zeul lor personal. Si cu asta basta. Nici usturoi n-ai mincat nici gura nuti pute. Ce daca democratia “prost inteleasa” am extrapola-o putin si am mai ingradi putin din liberatile astea democratice. Ca sa aparam “valorile” democratiei, binenteles!
Monday, January 26, 2009
Timpul gresit
nu am vazut nici un judeo-crestin sa protesteze impotriva folosirii calculatorului, internetului, telefonului (fie el mobil sau fix) caselor de marcat care nu mai permit (furtul din gestiune al amarastenilor) a automobilului de servici al preotului al televizorului si multe alte "instrumente diavolesti si pierzatoare de suflet".
Dar daca duhovnicul va va spune ca "hai mai facem si noi o concesie mica, deh ce sa facem ne schimbam si noi cu lumea" atunci vom merge iarasi in ...Rai. De data asta ne-a spus-o El ca e permis. Depinde de cotatia de la bursa. Asadar observati bine ca venitul unor este direct proportional cu aparitia "satanei". Cum ar spune maimutica scote castanele din foc cu mina altuia. As fi curios citi ar refuza implantul atunci cind vor sti ca copii lor nu vor putea sa intre intr-o scoala "safe" si vor prefera sa isi trimita copii la o scoala de periferie unde sint liberi sa moara orcind la alegerea unui descreierat. Citi nu vor implora implantul atunci cind nu vor putea cumpara cele necesare vietii? Citi refuza azi sa faca tranzactii online doar pentru ca nu e sigur si e un risc? Preferi cash sa platesti la ghiseu? Care ghiseu? Acolo e robotul !!! NU e tipenie de om in toata cladirea !! Oamenii se lupta cu fortele Raului pentru "linistea ta". Realizati si voi ca aceste lucruri sint pentru o alta lume pe care arhitectii au desenat-o nu pentru noi ci pentru clonele noastre. Acum se testeaza piata si rezultatul este pozitiv ca intodeauna. Progresul tehnologic este implementat cu ptina rezistenta la prima strigare dupa care (dupa ce da acordul popa si coana Veta din colt care are cipul si nu si-a pierdut sufletul) toti o sa zica uite eu m-am vaccinat si nu mi s-a intimplat nimic. Parintele Iustin Parvu are dreptate, toti il iubim (respectam) dar lumea pe care am construit-o e mult mai complexa. Eu il urmez la Manastire Petru Voda veniti si voi romani sa fim daca nu o suta de mii de credinciosi macar 1000 intr-o saptamina, iar in urmatoare luna sa fim zece mii. Nu, de ce? Nu va e credinta destul de puternica. Tehnologia e disponibila si e doar problema de cind va incepe sa fie implemantata. Mai asteptati un pic pin la pensie sau pina cresc copii? Mi-e teama ca este chestie de mamaliga aici! Si pierdere de vreme. Asteptati pina veti fi "diagnosticati" cu o boala de ei inventata sau masina teleghidata se va ciocni de parapet? NU, o sa veniti in jurul lui IP fara TCP hahaha (sau la Putna) sau in P-ta Universitatii si ce credeti ca o sa faceti 100,000 de "huligani" drogati si prostituate, inadaptati certati cu legea? Oamenii de bine vor sa-si vada de servici (care il mai au inca) si se vor plinge ca le tulburati viata (intirzieri, perturbari de trafic). Fratii vostrii crestini! In zadar vorbeste IP ca nu sint urechi sa auda si minte sa intelega. Unitatea vine numai in momente de criza culturala ori in Romania cultura autentica a poporului e pierduta sau compromisa. Pseudocultura face ca sa nu mai stea 3 pe un loc mai mult de 1 ora. Multe comentarii pe acest site sint ale unor oameni care stiu ce vorbesc si pe deasupra stiu mai ales ca vor ramine in baza de date ani de zile la dispozitia inchizitiei moderne. Nu numai la recenta legea idioata ma refer ci la toate ce au fost si vor fi decind acest mijloc de manipulare/informare in masa a intrat in casele noastre. Ele sint cunoscute si publicate in mii de carti dar omul "modern" a uitat sa citesca si astfel ii usureaza sarcina lui Montag. Este poporul roman unit in jurul unui crez atit de puternic incit sa respinga "avantajele" lumii. S-a vazut ca NU. Alegerea a facut-o poporul roman. Sa spunem acum ca nu vrem sa mergem pe drumul lor nu este decit tradare, dupa ce ai cheltuit banii sa spui eu acum vreau altceva sa fac.
Dar daca duhovnicul va va spune ca "hai mai facem si noi o concesie mica, deh ce sa facem ne schimbam si noi cu lumea" atunci vom merge iarasi in ...Rai. De data asta ne-a spus-o El ca e permis. Depinde de cotatia de la bursa. Asadar observati bine ca venitul unor este direct proportional cu aparitia "satanei". Cum ar spune maimutica scote castanele din foc cu mina altuia. As fi curios citi ar refuza implantul atunci cind vor sti ca copii lor nu vor putea sa intre intr-o scoala "safe" si vor prefera sa isi trimita copii la o scoala de periferie unde sint liberi sa moara orcind la alegerea unui descreierat. Citi nu vor implora implantul atunci cind nu vor putea cumpara cele necesare vietii? Citi refuza azi sa faca tranzactii online doar pentru ca nu e sigur si e un risc? Preferi cash sa platesti la ghiseu? Care ghiseu? Acolo e robotul !!! NU e tipenie de om in toata cladirea !! Oamenii se lupta cu fortele Raului pentru "linistea ta". Realizati si voi ca aceste lucruri sint pentru o alta lume pe care arhitectii au desenat-o nu pentru noi ci pentru clonele noastre. Acum se testeaza piata si rezultatul este pozitiv ca intodeauna. Progresul tehnologic este implementat cu ptina rezistenta la prima strigare dupa care (dupa ce da acordul popa si coana Veta din colt care are cipul si nu si-a pierdut sufletul) toti o sa zica uite eu m-am vaccinat si nu mi s-a intimplat nimic. Parintele Iustin Parvu are dreptate, toti il iubim (respectam) dar lumea pe care am construit-o e mult mai complexa. Eu il urmez la Manastire Petru Voda veniti si voi romani sa fim daca nu o suta de mii de credinciosi macar 1000 intr-o saptamina, iar in urmatoare luna sa fim zece mii. Nu, de ce? Nu va e credinta destul de puternica. Tehnologia e disponibila si e doar problema de cind va incepe sa fie implemantata. Mai asteptati un pic pin la pensie sau pina cresc copii? Mi-e teama ca este chestie de mamaliga aici! Si pierdere de vreme. Asteptati pina veti fi "diagnosticati" cu o boala de ei inventata sau masina teleghidata se va ciocni de parapet? NU, o sa veniti in jurul lui IP fara TCP hahaha (sau la Putna) sau in P-ta Universitatii si ce credeti ca o sa faceti 100,000 de "huligani" drogati si prostituate, inadaptati certati cu legea? Oamenii de bine vor sa-si vada de servici (care il mai au inca) si se vor plinge ca le tulburati viata (intirzieri, perturbari de trafic). Fratii vostrii crestini! In zadar vorbeste IP ca nu sint urechi sa auda si minte sa intelega. Unitatea vine numai in momente de criza culturala ori in Romania cultura autentica a poporului e pierduta sau compromisa. Pseudocultura face ca sa nu mai stea 3 pe un loc mai mult de 1 ora. Multe comentarii pe acest site sint ale unor oameni care stiu ce vorbesc si pe deasupra stiu mai ales ca vor ramine in baza de date ani de zile la dispozitia inchizitiei moderne. Nu numai la recenta legea idioata ma refer ci la toate ce au fost si vor fi decind acest mijloc de manipulare/informare in masa a intrat in casele noastre. Ele sint cunoscute si publicate in mii de carti dar omul "modern" a uitat sa citesca si astfel ii usureaza sarcina lui Montag. Este poporul roman unit in jurul unui crez atit de puternic incit sa respinga "avantajele" lumii. S-a vazut ca NU. Alegerea a facut-o poporul roman. Sa spunem acum ca nu vrem sa mergem pe drumul lor nu este decit tradare, dupa ce ai cheltuit banii sa spui eu acum vreau altceva sa fac.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Stimabilul Milton ori descentralizarea in lumea 3-a
Problemele au fost generate de guverne, amplificate de media (tot guvern) iar in spatele guvernului este cine? Contribuabilul este doar masca care inca nu a cazut dar in spate este tot the corporation. Asa ca incercarea mascata de a arunca vina asupra guvernelor este superflua deoarece nu poti culpabiliza pe cineva care nici macar nu exista. Societatea democratica este un tel, la fel cum a fost si utopicul comunism. Ceea ce se intimpla este incercarea de acaparare a banilor publici pentru finantarea unui sistem corupt. Criza este combustibilul economiei capitaliste iar corporatia este motorul unde se arde gazul de pomana.
"Ce se intampla cu firmele, oamenii ???" ei sint cei care platesc oalele sparte sau ei sint oalele sparte, ei sint victimele colaterale, de unde se vede viabilitatea acestui sistem.
Cit priveste economia privata ferita de coruptie, probabil te referi la teoriile care le invatati voi pe la scolile lui Friedman.
"Ce se intampla cu firmele, oamenii ???" ei sint cei care platesc oalele sparte sau ei sint oalele sparte, ei sint victimele colaterale, de unde se vede viabilitatea acestui sistem.
Cit priveste economia privata ferita de coruptie, probabil te referi la teoriile care le invatati voi pe la scolile lui Friedman.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Plimba ba URSUL
Every year in India and Pakistan over 100 bear cubs are illegally poached from the wild and sold at markets to nomadic gypsies known as Kalandars. Many of the cubs die from neglect, dehydration and distress during the long trek back to the Kalandar village. Those cubs that do survive are put on a punishing regime of starvation and beatings as a way to begin the brutal conditioning process to teach them perform for tourists. Their sensitive muzzles are pierced using a hot iron needle without anesthetic, which often leads to infection. A course rope is threaded through the hole and is used to roughly pull the bear around the crowded city streets. "The tug of this rope, along with the intense fear of the strike of a heavy stick, motivates the bear to lift its legs in turn and dance" says Geete Sashamani, a WSPA researcher who witnessed this painful and traumatic process.
Due to poor diets, abuse and neglect, dancing bears rarely live past the age of eight; whereas in the wild they can live up to 30 years. Once captured and cruelly tamed, a dancing bear can never be returned to the wild; its most optimistic outlook is retirement to a sanctuary. This endangered species will become extinct if this trade continues.
Due to poor diets, abuse and neglect, dancing bears rarely live past the age of eight; whereas in the wild they can live up to 30 years. Once captured and cruelly tamed, a dancing bear can never be returned to the wild; its most optimistic outlook is retirement to a sanctuary. This endangered species will become extinct if this trade continues.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Happy Nation
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS ABOUT DEMOGRAPHIC WINTER
Question : What is population stability, and why is the number 2.1 so important?
Answer:
Population stability is the point of equilibrium at which a country’s population is neither growing nor declining. In order to maintain current population, the average woman must have 2.1 children during her lifetime. Essentially, she needs to replace herself and a man. Because some children will die before reaching maturity, slightly more than two children are needed. Hence, 2.1.
A birthrate of more than 2.1 equals population growth. A birthrate of less than 2.1 means long term population decline. The rate of 2.1 is based on currently low infant mortality rates. In countries where infant mortality is higher, the birthrate required for population replacement would also be higher.
Question: What does the expression “Demographic Winter” mean?
Answer:
“Demographic Winter” denotes the worldwide decline in birthrates, also referred to as a “birth-dearth,” and what it portends.
Demographer Philip Longman (author of “The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity”) observes: “The ongoing global decline in human birthrates is the single most powerful force affecting the fate of nations and the future of society in the 21st. century.”
Worldwide, birthrates have been halved in the past 50 years. There are now 59 nations, with 44% of the world’s population, with below-replacement fertility
Sometime in this century, the world’s population will begin to decline. At a certain point, the decline will become rapid. We may even reach population free-fall in our lifetimes.For some countries, population decline is already a reality. Russia is losing three-quarters-of-a-million people a year. Its population (currently 145 million) is expected to fall by one-third by 2050.
The term “nuclear winter,” popularized in the 1980s, alluded to the catastrophic environmental impact of a nuclear war. The long-term consequences of demographic winter could be equally devastating.
Question: What is replacement fertility, and why is the number 2.1 so important?
Answer:
Replacement fertility is the point of equilibrium at which a country’s population is neither growing nor declining. In order to maintain current population, the average woman must have 2.1 children during her lifetime. Essentially, she needs to replace herself and a man. Because some children will die before reaching maturity, slightly more than two children are needed. Hence, 2.1.
A birthrate of more than 2.1 equals population growth. A birthrate of less than 2.1 long-term means population decline.
Question: If birthrates are declining, why does the world’s population continue to grow?
Answer:
If it’s already in motion, a car in neutral will continue moving for a while, especially if it’s going downhill, even if gas isn’t being injected into the engine.
Today’s population growth is due to two factors: 1. higher fertility rates in the 1950s and 60s, and 2. people living longer than ever before.
The thing to remember is this: Declining birthrates will equal a declining population worldwide at some point in the next few decades. In the West (especially in Europe) population decline will become a reality much sooner. In some countries, such as Russia, it’s already happening.
A nation’s demographic future can be seen in its current birthrate. In Europe, the number of children under 5 has declined by 36% since 1960. Worldwide, there are 6 million fewer children, 6 and under, today, than there were in 1990. If present trends continue, the United Nations estimates that by 2050 there will be 248 million fewer children in the world then there are now.
Question: Where are birthrates lowest?
Answer:
Of the 10 countries with the lowest birthrates, 9 are in Europe. Overall, the European fertility rate is 1.3, well below replacement level (2.1). No European nation has a replacement-level birthrate.
Italy’s fertility rate is 1.2. Spain’s is 1.1. That means in the not-too-distant future, absent massive immigration, these countries will lose half of their people in every generation.
Russia’s birthrate fell from 2.4 in 1990 to 1.17 today – a decline of more than 50% in less than 20 years. Each year, there are more abortions than live births in the Russian Federation.
While birthrates are also plummeting in developing nations, most still have above-replacement fertility – for the time being.
The U.S. fertility rate is around 2.1, just about replacement level, and continues to hover around that rate, due in part to higher immigrant birthrates. How long this will continue is anyone’s guess.
Question: What are the consequences of demographic decline?
Answer:
Economist Robert J. Samuelson wrote in a June 15, 2005 column in The Washington Post: “It’s hard to be a great power if your population is shriveling.” Samuelson warned: “Europe as we know it is going out of business…. Western Europe’s population grows dramatically grayer, projects the U.S. Census Bureau. Now about one-sixth of the population is 65 and older. By 2030, that could be one-fourth and by 2050, almost one-third.”
By the mid-point of this century, 16% of the world’s population will be over 65. By 2040, there will be 400 million elderly Chinese.
If present low birthrates persist, the European Union estimates there will be a continent-wide shortfall of 20 million workers by 2030.
Who will operate the factories and farms in the Europe of the future? Who will develop the natural resources? Where will Russia find the soldiers to guard the frontiers of the largest nation on Earth?
Who will care for a graying population? A burgeoning elderly population combined with a shrinking work force will lead to a train-wreck for state pension systems.
This only skims the surface of the way demographic decline will change the face of civilization. Even the environment will be adversely impacted. With severely strained public budgets, developed nations will no longer be willing to shoulder the costs of industrial clean-up or a reduction of CO2 emissions.
Question: What factors contribute to demographic decline?
Answer:
A number of social trends of the post-war era have converged to create a perfect storm for Demographic Winter.
Men and women are delaying marriage, making it less likely they’ll have more than one or two children. Today in the West, almost one in two marriages ends in divorce. The children of divorce are less likely to marry and form families themselves.
More married women are putting off having children for careers. After 35, it becomes progressively harder for women to conceive.
The news and entertainment media tell young adults that satisfaction comes from careers, romance, travel and “personal growth” – not from having children. It’s rare that Hollywood even portrays large families (today, more than 2 children). The culture’s message is live-for-moment and live primarily for yourself, with no sense of obligation to generations past or concern for posterity.
The growth of cohabitation also has an impact. (In Scandinavia, almost as many couples are living together as married.) Cohabitation is not conducive to childbearing or childrearing.
For the past 20 to 30 years, children have been taught that over-population (the so-called population bomb) will wreak havoc on the environment and economic development. Not surprisingly, children thus indoctrinated frequently choose to have fewer children when they reach maturity.
Religious observance has been shown to correlate with higher birthrates. The increasing secularization of Western societies has been accompanied by lower birthrates.
Thus, every aspect of modernity works against family life and in favor of singleness and small families or voluntary childlessness.
Question: Can’t the problem be fixed by increased immigration?
Answer:
In a demographic sense, this is robbing Peter to pay Paul.
The host country gains people, but the home country loses. The developing world, which has seen its own birthrate cut in half since 1970 (from almost 6 to barely 4), can ill afford to lose large numbers through emigration. The loss of labor from these countries adversely impacts their own economy and since the majority of those who leave are the men, many children are now growing up without a father, creating other social problems for these countries. The developing world is paying a high price to bail out the developed world’s lack of labor due to low fertility rates.
Mass immigration changes the national character of the host country. Immigrants tend to have a lower education level than natives. Many never learn the language of their new home or identify with its history and heritage.This changes the social and political makeup of the host countries, in some cases so dramatically that it is causing social and political unrest.
Question: Can’t demographic winter be countered by governments encouraging people to have more children?
Answer:
This is being tried in Western Europe and Russia. The Russian Federation pays families a bonus of 250,000 rubles (the equivalent of $9,200) for every child after the first – in a nation where the average monthly wage is only $330. It’s not working.
Couples decide to have children for all kinds of reasons – religious, emotional, cultural, etc. Money doesn’t seem to be one of them, although money concerns are sometimes cited as a reason for having fewer children.
Children are a life-long commitment. While governments should make childrearing easier, by lowering the tax-burden on families (out of self-interest if not fairness), cash incentives so far haven’t worked.
Question: If the United States has near-replacement fertility, why should we care?
Answer:
All of the factors that are leading Europe into the depths of Demographic Winter are present in the United States as well, including high divorce rates, the rise of cohabitation, families putting off procreation to pursue careers, an anti-family culture and voluntary childlessness.
We may be a few decades behind Europe, but we’re heading in the same direction.
National economies are interconnected to such an extent that the impact of economic collapse in one country or region can be felt around the world.
The social, political and economic decline of previously stable nations can destabilize entire regions and create perils for neighbors and far-away allies. The United States is connected to Europe economically and through multiple security treaties.
Question: What Is “Demographic Winter: Decline of the Human Family”
Answer:
“Demographic Winter: Decline of the Human Family,” is the first of two documentary films. Together they explore every aspect of demographic decline based on interviews with scholars, researchers, economists, demographers, government representatives, civil and religious leaders from 33 countries.
Produced by Barry McLerran and directed by Rick Stout, with executive director Steven Smoot, “Demographic Winter” brings together a number of disciplines to examine and analyze what could be the greatest threat confronting humanity in the 21st century.
Question : What is population stability, and why is the number 2.1 so important?
Answer:
Population stability is the point of equilibrium at which a country’s population is neither growing nor declining. In order to maintain current population, the average woman must have 2.1 children during her lifetime. Essentially, she needs to replace herself and a man. Because some children will die before reaching maturity, slightly more than two children are needed. Hence, 2.1.
A birthrate of more than 2.1 equals population growth. A birthrate of less than 2.1 means long term population decline. The rate of 2.1 is based on currently low infant mortality rates. In countries where infant mortality is higher, the birthrate required for population replacement would also be higher.
Question: What does the expression “Demographic Winter” mean?
Answer:
“Demographic Winter” denotes the worldwide decline in birthrates, also referred to as a “birth-dearth,” and what it portends.
Demographer Philip Longman (author of “The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity”) observes: “The ongoing global decline in human birthrates is the single most powerful force affecting the fate of nations and the future of society in the 21st. century.”
Worldwide, birthrates have been halved in the past 50 years. There are now 59 nations, with 44% of the world’s population, with below-replacement fertility
Sometime in this century, the world’s population will begin to decline. At a certain point, the decline will become rapid. We may even reach population free-fall in our lifetimes.For some countries, population decline is already a reality. Russia is losing three-quarters-of-a-million people a year. Its population (currently 145 million) is expected to fall by one-third by 2050.
The term “nuclear winter,” popularized in the 1980s, alluded to the catastrophic environmental impact of a nuclear war. The long-term consequences of demographic winter could be equally devastating.
Question: What is replacement fertility, and why is the number 2.1 so important?
Answer:
Replacement fertility is the point of equilibrium at which a country’s population is neither growing nor declining. In order to maintain current population, the average woman must have 2.1 children during her lifetime. Essentially, she needs to replace herself and a man. Because some children will die before reaching maturity, slightly more than two children are needed. Hence, 2.1.
A birthrate of more than 2.1 equals population growth. A birthrate of less than 2.1 long-term means population decline.
Question: If birthrates are declining, why does the world’s population continue to grow?
Answer:
If it’s already in motion, a car in neutral will continue moving for a while, especially if it’s going downhill, even if gas isn’t being injected into the engine.
Today’s population growth is due to two factors: 1. higher fertility rates in the 1950s and 60s, and 2. people living longer than ever before.
The thing to remember is this: Declining birthrates will equal a declining population worldwide at some point in the next few decades. In the West (especially in Europe) population decline will become a reality much sooner. In some countries, such as Russia, it’s already happening.
A nation’s demographic future can be seen in its current birthrate. In Europe, the number of children under 5 has declined by 36% since 1960. Worldwide, there are 6 million fewer children, 6 and under, today, than there were in 1990. If present trends continue, the United Nations estimates that by 2050 there will be 248 million fewer children in the world then there are now.
Question: Where are birthrates lowest?
Answer:
Of the 10 countries with the lowest birthrates, 9 are in Europe. Overall, the European fertility rate is 1.3, well below replacement level (2.1). No European nation has a replacement-level birthrate.
Italy’s fertility rate is 1.2. Spain’s is 1.1. That means in the not-too-distant future, absent massive immigration, these countries will lose half of their people in every generation.
Russia’s birthrate fell from 2.4 in 1990 to 1.17 today – a decline of more than 50% in less than 20 years. Each year, there are more abortions than live births in the Russian Federation.
While birthrates are also plummeting in developing nations, most still have above-replacement fertility – for the time being.
The U.S. fertility rate is around 2.1, just about replacement level, and continues to hover around that rate, due in part to higher immigrant birthrates. How long this will continue is anyone’s guess.
Question: What are the consequences of demographic decline?
Answer:
Economist Robert J. Samuelson wrote in a June 15, 2005 column in The Washington Post: “It’s hard to be a great power if your population is shriveling.” Samuelson warned: “Europe as we know it is going out of business…. Western Europe’s population grows dramatically grayer, projects the U.S. Census Bureau. Now about one-sixth of the population is 65 and older. By 2030, that could be one-fourth and by 2050, almost one-third.”
By the mid-point of this century, 16% of the world’s population will be over 65. By 2040, there will be 400 million elderly Chinese.
If present low birthrates persist, the European Union estimates there will be a continent-wide shortfall of 20 million workers by 2030.
Who will operate the factories and farms in the Europe of the future? Who will develop the natural resources? Where will Russia find the soldiers to guard the frontiers of the largest nation on Earth?
Who will care for a graying population? A burgeoning elderly population combined with a shrinking work force will lead to a train-wreck for state pension systems.
This only skims the surface of the way demographic decline will change the face of civilization. Even the environment will be adversely impacted. With severely strained public budgets, developed nations will no longer be willing to shoulder the costs of industrial clean-up or a reduction of CO2 emissions.
Question: What factors contribute to demographic decline?
Answer:
A number of social trends of the post-war era have converged to create a perfect storm for Demographic Winter.
Men and women are delaying marriage, making it less likely they’ll have more than one or two children. Today in the West, almost one in two marriages ends in divorce. The children of divorce are less likely to marry and form families themselves.
More married women are putting off having children for careers. After 35, it becomes progressively harder for women to conceive.
The news and entertainment media tell young adults that satisfaction comes from careers, romance, travel and “personal growth” – not from having children. It’s rare that Hollywood even portrays large families (today, more than 2 children). The culture’s message is live-for-moment and live primarily for yourself, with no sense of obligation to generations past or concern for posterity.
The growth of cohabitation also has an impact. (In Scandinavia, almost as many couples are living together as married.) Cohabitation is not conducive to childbearing or childrearing.
For the past 20 to 30 years, children have been taught that over-population (the so-called population bomb) will wreak havoc on the environment and economic development. Not surprisingly, children thus indoctrinated frequently choose to have fewer children when they reach maturity.
Religious observance has been shown to correlate with higher birthrates. The increasing secularization of Western societies has been accompanied by lower birthrates.
Thus, every aspect of modernity works against family life and in favor of singleness and small families or voluntary childlessness.
Question: Can’t the problem be fixed by increased immigration?
Answer:
In a demographic sense, this is robbing Peter to pay Paul.
The host country gains people, but the home country loses. The developing world, which has seen its own birthrate cut in half since 1970 (from almost 6 to barely 4), can ill afford to lose large numbers through emigration. The loss of labor from these countries adversely impacts their own economy and since the majority of those who leave are the men, many children are now growing up without a father, creating other social problems for these countries. The developing world is paying a high price to bail out the developed world’s lack of labor due to low fertility rates.
Mass immigration changes the national character of the host country. Immigrants tend to have a lower education level than natives. Many never learn the language of their new home or identify with its history and heritage.This changes the social and political makeup of the host countries, in some cases so dramatically that it is causing social and political unrest.
Question: Can’t demographic winter be countered by governments encouraging people to have more children?
Answer:
This is being tried in Western Europe and Russia. The Russian Federation pays families a bonus of 250,000 rubles (the equivalent of $9,200) for every child after the first – in a nation where the average monthly wage is only $330. It’s not working.
Couples decide to have children for all kinds of reasons – religious, emotional, cultural, etc. Money doesn’t seem to be one of them, although money concerns are sometimes cited as a reason for having fewer children.
Children are a life-long commitment. While governments should make childrearing easier, by lowering the tax-burden on families (out of self-interest if not fairness), cash incentives so far haven’t worked.
Question: If the United States has near-replacement fertility, why should we care?
Answer:
All of the factors that are leading Europe into the depths of Demographic Winter are present in the United States as well, including high divorce rates, the rise of cohabitation, families putting off procreation to pursue careers, an anti-family culture and voluntary childlessness.
We may be a few decades behind Europe, but we’re heading in the same direction.
National economies are interconnected to such an extent that the impact of economic collapse in one country or region can be felt around the world.
The social, political and economic decline of previously stable nations can destabilize entire regions and create perils for neighbors and far-away allies. The United States is connected to Europe economically and through multiple security treaties.
Question: What Is “Demographic Winter: Decline of the Human Family”
Answer:
“Demographic Winter: Decline of the Human Family,” is the first of two documentary films. Together they explore every aspect of demographic decline based on interviews with scholars, researchers, economists, demographers, government representatives, civil and religious leaders from 33 countries.
Produced by Barry McLerran and directed by Rick Stout, with executive director Steven Smoot, “Demographic Winter” brings together a number of disciplines to examine and analyze what could be the greatest threat confronting humanity in the 21st century.
Demographic Winter: Decline of the Human Family
One of the most ominous events of modern history is quietly unfolding. Social scientists and economists agree - we are headed toward a demographic winter which threatens to have catastrophic social and economic consequences. The effects will be severe and long lasting and are already becoming manifest in much of Europe.
A groundbreaking film, Demographic Winter: Decline of the Human Family, reveals in chilling soberness how societies with diminished family influence are now grimly seen as being in social and economic jeopardy.
Demographic Winter draws upon experts from all around the world - demographers, economists, sociologists, psychologists, civic and religious leaders, parliamentarians and diplomats. Together, they reveal the dangers facing society and the world’s economies, dangers far more imminent than global warming and at least as severe. These experts will discuss how:
The “population bomb” not only did not have the predicted consequences, but almost all of the developed countries of the world are now experiencing fertility rates far below replacement levels. Birthrates have fallen so low that even immigration cannot replace declining populations, and this migration is sapping strength from developing countries, the fertility rates for many of which are now falling at a faster pace than did those of the developed countries.
The economies of the world will continue to contract as the “human capital” spoken of by Nobel Prize winning economist Gary Becker, diminishes. The engines of commerce will be strained as the workers of today fail to replace themselves and are burdened by the responsibility to support an aging population.
Government programs will slow-bleed by the decrease in tax dollars received from an ever shrinking work force. The skyrocketing ratio of the old retirees to the young workers will render current-day social security systems completely unable to support the aging population.
Our attempts to modernize through social engineering policies and programs have left children growing up in broken homes, with absentee parents and little exposure to extended family, disconnected from the generations, and these children are experiencing severe psychological, sociological and economic consequences. The intact family’s immeasurable role in the development and prosperity of human societies is crumbling.
The influence of social and economic problems on ever shrinking, increasingly disconnected generations will compound and accelerate the deterioration. Our children and our children’s children will bear the economic and social burden of regenerating the “human capital” that accounts for 80% of wealth in the economy, and they will be ill-equipped to do so.
Is there a “tipping point”, after which the accelerating consequences will make recovery impossible without complete social and economic collapse? Even the experts can’t tell us how far we can go down this road, oblivious to the outcomes, until we reach a point where sliding into the void becomes unpreventable.
Only if the political incorrectness of talking about the natural family within policy circles is overcome will solutions begin to be found. These solutions will necessarily result in policy changes, changes that will support and promote the natural, intact family.
Just as it took the cumulative involvement of activist organizations, policy makers, the business world and the media to create the unintended consequences we are beginning to experience, so it will take the holistic contribution of all of these entities, together with civic and religious organizations, to change the hearts and minds of all of society to bring about a reversal.
It may be too late to avoid some very severe consequences, but with effort we may be able to preclude calamity. Demographic Winter lays out a forthright province of discussion. The warning voices in this film need to be heard before a silent, portentous fall turns into a long, hard winter.
A groundbreaking film, Demographic Winter: Decline of the Human Family, reveals in chilling soberness how societies with diminished family influence are now grimly seen as being in social and economic jeopardy.
Demographic Winter draws upon experts from all around the world - demographers, economists, sociologists, psychologists, civic and religious leaders, parliamentarians and diplomats. Together, they reveal the dangers facing society and the world’s economies, dangers far more imminent than global warming and at least as severe. These experts will discuss how:
The “population bomb” not only did not have the predicted consequences, but almost all of the developed countries of the world are now experiencing fertility rates far below replacement levels. Birthrates have fallen so low that even immigration cannot replace declining populations, and this migration is sapping strength from developing countries, the fertility rates for many of which are now falling at a faster pace than did those of the developed countries.
The economies of the world will continue to contract as the “human capital” spoken of by Nobel Prize winning economist Gary Becker, diminishes. The engines of commerce will be strained as the workers of today fail to replace themselves and are burdened by the responsibility to support an aging population.
Government programs will slow-bleed by the decrease in tax dollars received from an ever shrinking work force. The skyrocketing ratio of the old retirees to the young workers will render current-day social security systems completely unable to support the aging population.
Our attempts to modernize through social engineering policies and programs have left children growing up in broken homes, with absentee parents and little exposure to extended family, disconnected from the generations, and these children are experiencing severe psychological, sociological and economic consequences. The intact family’s immeasurable role in the development and prosperity of human societies is crumbling.
The influence of social and economic problems on ever shrinking, increasingly disconnected generations will compound and accelerate the deterioration. Our children and our children’s children will bear the economic and social burden of regenerating the “human capital” that accounts for 80% of wealth in the economy, and they will be ill-equipped to do so.
Is there a “tipping point”, after which the accelerating consequences will make recovery impossible without complete social and economic collapse? Even the experts can’t tell us how far we can go down this road, oblivious to the outcomes, until we reach a point where sliding into the void becomes unpreventable.
Only if the political incorrectness of talking about the natural family within policy circles is overcome will solutions begin to be found. These solutions will necessarily result in policy changes, changes that will support and promote the natural, intact family.
Just as it took the cumulative involvement of activist organizations, policy makers, the business world and the media to create the unintended consequences we are beginning to experience, so it will take the holistic contribution of all of these entities, together with civic and religious organizations, to change the hearts and minds of all of society to bring about a reversal.
It may be too late to avoid some very severe consequences, but with effort we may be able to preclude calamity. Demographic Winter lays out a forthright province of discussion. The warning voices in this film need to be heard before a silent, portentous fall turns into a long, hard winter.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Monsanto Contaminates Romania with Genetic Engineering
 Recent Greenpeace research in Romania has exposed the fact that Monsanto's introduction of genetically engineered soybeans has virtually destroyed both conventional and organic farming in many regions. Neither the Romanian government nor Monsanto applied the precautionary principle in assessing the impact of these crops in agriculture.Berlin, Germany, 11 January 2006 Greenpeace today, joined by a former manager of Monsanto and Limagrain in Romania, Mr Dragos Dima, at a press conference at the International Green Week in Berlin exposed how Monsanto will contaminate EU agriculture with genetically engineered (GE) Soya. U.S. biotech giant made an application in December 2005 to the European Union to grow its genetically engineered (GE) 'Roundup Ready' soybeans across the whole of Europe once its current licence - permitting the beans' import but not cultivation - expires in 2006 (1).more |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)