Step 1:
Brigette DePape: She did not think that Stephan Harper's agenda for the future would be well for future generations so she took a stand by making a "Stop Harper" sign and held it up at a Senate meeting.
Stephan Harper and company: Did not think that this action was appropriate and expelled her from the room with security and later fired her.
Step 2:
Brigette DePape wanted to change something in the government in a way that she thought would benefit her generation most. She believed that by showing that sign she would start a movement to eliminate Harper and improve plans for future generations.
Step 3:
"Harper's agenda is disastrous for this country and for my generation," DePape said in the release. "We have to stop him from wasting billions on fighter jets, military bases, and corporate tax cuts while cutting social programs and destroying the climate. Most people in this country know what we need are green jobs, better medicare, and a healthy environment for future generations." – CBC.ca News
Step 4:
I suggest that Brigette talks to Stephan Harper about her concerns.
Step 5:
Harper could listen to what Brigette has to say about the current agenda and suggest making small changes to the area that she is concerned about. In return Brigette could say that if her suggestions didn't work out as planed then Harper could change the schedule back.
Step 6:
In three weeks they can meet up again and see if what Brigette said is doing well and if it is then they could make even more improvements. If it is not going so well then they could change it back the way it was before.
Step 7:
Brigette and Harper will meet up and discuss the concerns that Brigette has. Harper can make a few small changes in the most needed areas. In three weeks they meet up again to discuss how thing are going. If they are not doing well then Harper can change his agenda back, but if they are going more smoothly then before then they could make more changes and improvements.
No comments:
Post a Comment